The Schtick of God

Like you, I have no idea what the Schtick of God means.

I was lucky to find an uncopyrighted picture of a guy holding one.

I thought about calling it the Law of Fractal Geometries,  but as it turns out, all the other physical world laws suck like a tornado, and I have no intention of adding another stinker to the pile.

Hence, The Schtick of God shall be a loosely bound set of Seven Schtickly Postulates intended to infer organization to Binary Dimension Theory, and Fractal Geometry.


  1.  The Undimensioned is unbounded.
  2.  The Dimensioned is bounded by Zero and Infinity, because theories sans math suck.
  3.  The Undimensioned and Dimensioned, form the Fundamental Law of Identity, which means there is literally nothing else, so stop looking.
  4.  The Dimensioned is commonly known as The Universe. The Undimensioned is commonly known as Heaven, Nirvana, or stuff like that. 
  5.  The Dimensioned is a subset of The Undimensioned. More accurately, The Universe is a subset of Heaven. 
  6.  The Universe is fractal.
  7.  The Universe consists solely of Higgs Chains, Higgs Junctions and at least one Higgs Gate.

OK, by my count, that’s everything that is, every was, or ever will be in seven lines.

Schticked out? Me too.

Lets relax in The Pool.

Bob Lazar and the Cracker Jack Prize

If you are reading this, you are either a stable genius or a non-stable genius. The jury is out. 

There is, however, a prize at the bottom of this particular cracker jack box.

Last week I stumbled onto a Netflix piece about Bob Lazar.

It was a thoughtfully made piece about a guy that claims to have worked for the Government in the 1980’s, reverse engineering alien propulsion systems.

Sounded like nonsense.

In the video, Mr Lazar drew a cartoonish picture of  a supposed UFO propulsion system.

Crazy stuff. I have never seen a UFO, and am skeptical of the whole topic.

The problem is, I recognized the propulsion system  immediately.

Mr Lazar gave an explanation of the component parts of the cartoon, and how it all worked.

He is clearly a smart guy, but he got it all wrong.

Had Mr Lazar been a student of Binary Dimension Theory, and Binary Field Theory, my guess is that he would have recognized the propulsion system and explained it correctly 30 years ago.

He was an engineer. Wrong tool for the job.

Should have used a cryptologist. Duh.

Makes me wonder if they ever got it right.


So what?

Well,  Binary Dimension Theory predicts similar propulsion systems in ways that normal people can understand, if one invests time to become familiar with the terms and concepts.

There is no doubt in my mind that the propulsion systems will work, not only to explain the contraptions Mr Lazar claims to have seen, but to design our own, even better systems.

So what’s the Cracker Jack Prize?

Bitchin’ vacations at breakneck speed. Oh, and world domination. Yeah, that.

Like I said;

Either stable genius or non-stable genius.

The Pool decides. Keep swimming.

Worm Holes

The coolest thing to come out of Hollywood during my lifetime is the visualization of Worm Holes, or wormholes.

They look, and sometimes feel, convincing, and science does it’s best to propogate the ilusion.

Here’s the gig. There are no such things as wormholes. Sorry.

There are certainly physical analogs in nature that we see and understand, though. Whirlpools in a brook, or water draining out of sinks, or tornado shapes or even huge storms as viewed from space.

They all have a telltale physical structure that leads to our notion of wormholes in space that lead to really cool vacation spots.

That whirlpool shape. It repeats in nature over and over and over, for good reason.

If you have spent much time in The Pool, you will have read bits about Higgs Chains, and the basic fractal geometry of Dimension. Both give a window into that Whirlpool shape, and exactly what causes it.

I will repeat it here, for your convenience. Fractal Compression is the phenomenon that gives rise to the Whirlpools observed in nature. Simple as that.

Well, hold on, if Binary Dimension Theory contains structures that explain whirlpools, why not wormholes.

Well, you are in luck.

It’s not exactly the Hollywood version of wormholes, but there are some similarities predicted by, and within, Binary Dimension Theory.

I will leave you with a teaser of sorts. Binary Dimension Theory predicts volumes in cartesian fractal  manifolds that connect blobs of dimension.

The volumes are predicted to be cyllindrical, axially aligned, and connected across vast volumes.

In a picture of the Universe they would look like threads connecting galaxies or groups of galaxies.

I do not know if they have been observed yet, but they are there, and may have a component that is visible in wavelengths we can observe, if we know how and where to look.

Are they wormholes? No, not in the Hollywood sense. They are, however, connectors of sorts, that are likely traversable by objects of roughly similar Dimensional Density.

If you see a water slide in The Pool, feel free to climb in, although the return path may be an enigma wrapped in a riddle.


Like time, this topic is laughable.

Once again, everybody has heard of it, and a few can describe it, sort of. A few have made Anti-Matter their life’s work at prestigious laboratories using your tax dollars. Scary thought.

Anti-Matter is an interesting legend with no basis in fact.


OK, so is there an analogue to Anti-Matter in Binary Dimension Theory?


In a philosophical way, sort of.

There is Dimensioned and Un-Dimensioned.

Can Un-Dimensioned be present in a Dimensioned Manifold?


Oh, how can that be, Senor Houdini?… casually ask.

Well, your thoughts are good examples of undimensioned constructs that have a temporal presence in Dimensioned Space. Well, more like bio-electromagnetic shadows of undimensioned constructs in dimensioned space. Teeny little traces that exist in your brain as wee little pertubations, that wink back into nothingness when least expected.

So is that like Anti-Matter?


According to legend, Anti-Matter blows shit up. BOOM! Sometime thoughts blow shit up, but it’s a different kind of shit. Pardon my French.

OK, so there is no nexus between Anti-Matter and Binary Dimension Theory.


Glad we sorted that out.

If you see an Anti-Matter pool, run away, because if you jump in it, it will blow your shit up, like the guy in the picture, according to legend.

The Pool of Thought is safer, sort of.


Wikipedia: In physics, energy is the quantitative property that must be transferred to an object in order to perform work on, or to heat, the object.

That’s kind of where the trail ends because there is no Wikipedia article for quantitative property. There are things like physical properties, and such, which are, I guess, are properties that can be represented by numbers.

OK, like numbers  of what? Hmm… No further clues.

Trying to research energy is an academic train wreck.

Nobody knows what it is, we just know that stuff does cool tricks, and it is apparently caused by ENERGY, whatever that is.

Einstein tried to rub the Energy booger on Matter, suggesting that Matter and Energy have an equivalence. You know, the E is equal to M C squared thing.

The problem is that C (the speed of light) is infinitely variable, which makes E (energy) arbitrary, or close to it.

If Einstein had postulated that Energy = Mass, he would have been much closer to being correct.

So much for Physics, and Energy, as we learned them in school. Both are unsupported legends that we slap numbers on to try to make sense of things.

In order to understand what we currently call ENERGY, we have to adopt a framework that allows it to be defined, or at least more accurately described.

Enter Binary Dimension Theory.

In Binary Dimension Theory, there is only Dimensioned, and Undimensioned. That’s everything, honest.

Energy is an artifact of the two, combined.

In the Dimensioned, there is only one quantity/quality, and that is Dimension itself.

So to be exact, DIMENSION = ENERGY.

If you want to feel froggy, you could imply that the amount of ENERGY in a fractal manifold is equal to the amount of dimension (kind of like MATTER) in the fractal manifold.

The problem is, fractal manifolds are immune to absolute measurement, and even if you could, there is no standing Mathematics that describes fractal manifold expansion or contraction, so whatever numbers you assign wouldn’t matter anyway.

OK, not-Einstein, that sounds like nonsense, you say.

There is good news.

Energy is definable in the terms described by Binary Dimension Theory.

The specific terms are Higgs Chains and Higgs Junctions, which are specific geometries of Dimension. Again, Higgs Chains and Higgs Junctions describe Dimension, and nothing else, because the Universe (and everything not Universe) is Binary, remember?

Best to leave it at that for now.

To recap the above paragraphs,

  •  Energy is currently undefined
  • Energy requires a new framework that allows description
  • The framework is Binary Dimension Theory
  • A workable definition of Energy is contained within Binary Dimension Theory
  • The definition is in terms of Higgs Chains and Higgs Junctions
  • If you want to know more, you have to swim in The Pool a bit longer.







Positive and Negative

Again, an ambiguous start. Lots of meanings for positive and negative.

If you have ever stuck your finger inside a Christmas light socket, or touched the tip of your tongue to the terminals of a 9-volt battery, or seen lightening, that’s the positive and negative I am talking about.

Everybody knows what positive and negative are, but like most everything else, nobody can explain it.

Our grade school textbooks show pictures of little round balls that have a ” + or -” sign stamped on for good measure. I guess that’s supposed to mean something, if you have a clue what the + or – actually means, which is where everything you learned about plus and minus, and electricity, and magnetic fields, and most everything else falls apart.

We are taught that there are mysterious little charges and electrons and fluff that snog about and do magic by making things positive and negative with some sort of Hogwarts spell. The smarter the crowd, the more complex the magic, but honestly, it’s all the same thing, just making up a story to explain what we see.

Hence this writing. Yes, this is just another story to explain what we see, but at least this one makes sense, and doesn’t require a dozen or so other even more complex legends to support it.

For starters, the dominant structures found in nature look like spheres. They aren’t really spheres, but that’s what our eyes see and our hands feel. Our eyes are also spheres, so that we can see the dominant structures. Imagine that.

In a world dominated by spherical structures, the notion of plus and minus has no meaning, literally. It’s ambiguous, at least for all points on the surface.

Pick up a marble or ball bearing and try to differentiate two different points on the surface. Good luck. You can’t, unless there is a chip or a variation.  That’s what makes spheres spheres, the total lack of differentiation. So how is plus and minus supposed to work?

What about the shock we get on our tongue from touching a battery, or the bang that happens when lightning strikes?

Are they because somebody stamped magical little +’s and -‘s on stuff?


Enter Binary Dimension Theory

In Binary Dimension Theory, all geometry is fractal, and the fractal has a pointy end and a big end. Check out other places in The Pool to find out more.

Everything we perceive as plus or minus or + and – or positive and negative is a direct result of having a pointy end and a big end.  Fractals produce a kind of compression, or expansion, and the difference between the spatial compression and expansion we have labeled Positive and Negative, because it was the first thing that came to mind.

We never really knew what created the positive and negative, we just knew it was there, and so we created legends about how it got there.

In actuality, there are no patchwork of legends required. No magic involved.

Just Binary Dimension Theory. 

It’s really simple, and it works.

Once you see it, things get really easy to understand. Keep reading.

Try to stay positive ok? Ha ha.



Self-Licking Ice Cream Cones

Recently a reader pointed out that using the word Dimension to explain Dimension Theory is like a self-licking ice cream cone. She used a different word, tautology I believe, to explain why my ideas were invalidated by apparently circular logic.

Well, I would gladly offer up the fact that my ideas roundly suck, even without using abstract ancient Greek metaphors…..but I went to the dictionary to see what she meant anyway.

Then I had a good laugh.

Here’s why my Ice Cream Cone is NOT self-licking.

Dimension is taught in schools as literally a measure of length, width or height, or abstractly, a combination of all three. In advanced curriculums, Dimension is sometimes used to connote a seemingly measurable property, such as time.

Ok, so it’s something we are taught to measure to use as a framework for measuring other stuff. Got it.

When you read the word “Dimension” in The Pool, it does NOT mean a length, width, height, or combination of the three. It does NOT mean “time” or any other arbitrarily measurable widget.

In Binary Dimension Theory, Dimension is not a scalar, it cannot be measured, well, it can, but the measurement is completely arbitrary and absolutely temporal.

Binary Dimension Theory is based on fractal constructs, and fractals are immune to any sort of meaningful measurement, simply because of their inherent characteristics.

It would be nonsensical to try to apply the classical meaning of the word DIMENSION to Binary Dimension Theory, so please stop it.

Why did I use the word Dimension in the first place? Because the idea is a good placeholder, with a sense of wonder that is salvageable by adding some original thought and creativity.

In Binary Dimension Theory, Dimension is what holds space open, literally. 

Dimension, in Binary Dimension Theory, has a analog, that I made up to try to help people get their brain around an infinitely variable fractal manifold.

It’s not a good analog, but it gets the idea across, with a bit of imagination, and willingness to ditch the useless notion of measurable widgets you learned in school.

Lots of info on The REAL Dimension in The Pool. Have at it.

Please feel free to get a Pool Cone and enjoy it while you are in The Pool. But there’s a caveat, you have to lick it, it WILL NOT lick itself.

Bon Apetit’

Flat Earth Theory

I adore people who believe the earth is flat. Absolutely fascinating.

I adore them because they are smart, and inquisitive; (although demonstrably logic challenged), but mostly because they sense that what they learned in school is way wrong. Catastrophically wrong.

In a sort of intellectual revolt, Flat Earthers constructed a thread of logic that explains how they looked at bits of fluff that didn’t add up, saw a conspiracy concerning the shape of the earth, and are the only ones brave enough to say something about it in public.

They then formed a Flat Earth collective, and the rest is history.

Here’s a SERIOUS warning, if you look at flat earth stuff long enough, and tend toward believing conspiracy theories, you might actually adopt their logic, no matter how smart, or educated you are, or how stupid the whole idea looked when you started.

The reason is simple. Flat Earth Theory is seductive, because some stuff doesn’t make sense, and the more you question the parts that don’t make sense, the more frustrated you get with your education, because you swallowed it whole, and paid for the opportunity with a large portion of the most fun part of your life.

OK, here’s the disclaimer, the only bit of logic the Flat Earth Theorists got right, is that their education was, well, serially faulted. Everything else is highly entertaining, well intended balderdash, but not for the reasons you might expect.

Flat Earther Theorists conflict with “normal people” over basic geometry. The problem is, neither Flat Earthers nor “normal people” got it right.

Cutting to the chase,

  1. The Earth is not Round
  2. The Earth is not Flat
  3. Traditional geometry, that is, based on the Axioms of Euclid, things like circles and triangles and planes and lines, will NEVER resolve the argument, because it CAN’T.

OK, since you are in The Pool, I will graciously throw you a Life Preserver.

The only logical construct that resolves items 1 through 3 above is Binary Dimension Theory.

The physical universe is not flat or round, it is a Fractal Geometry, not a Euclidian Geometry, and until you grasp that logic, the physical universe will continue to be too conflicted to make sense.

Oh, and, by the way, watching arguments over whether stuff is round or flat is, well, frankly, the best show in town, so I secretly hope the Flat Earth movement continues to enlist colorful personalities to press the brawl, and that the science community continues to eye-roll, head-shake and wink at each other.

Once you understand Binary Dimension Theory, the whole thing makes perfect sense, and the arguments stop, and you will experience a profound sense of comfort.

So, I hope that you are a Flat Earther, because if so, you are of the right mind set to comprehend Binary Dimension Theory.

Binary Dimension Theory will likely save your life, literally.

Especially if you start reading Flat Earth stuff without the life preserver I gave you.

Have an apparently flat, but actually fractal swim.


Quantum Entanglement

This piece is for my dear friend Rich, a fellow swabbie and Pool frequenter.

Neils Bohr and Albert Einstein had regular cat house brawls over this topic, hence the clearly understandable entanglement graphic.

By the way, neither party got it right. They stopped at the patently obvious, and failed completely to investigate the underlying structures. Alas, such was the state of physics 100 or so years ago.

Quantum entanglement is not something new, it is part of the fabric of dimension, the norm, not the exception. It is not voodoo or spooky or magical or abnormal, or even odd, for that matter.

In Binary Dimension Theory, quantum entanglement is pre-school stuff, so I have a hard time seeing what all the arguing was about.

Everybody knows what chains are. Links that are hooked together sequentially.

OK, nothing new here. The particular kind of chain that explains quantum entanglement is called a Higgs Chain.

Higgs Chains are axially aligned bits of dimension. They would look like whirlpools nested inside whirlpools, nested inside whirlpools.

Anywhere along the Higgs Chain, you will find entanglement. It is the nature of fractal geometry. It is also the nature of a chain, I mean seriously, have you ever met a chain that wasn’t entangled? No tangled links = no chain. Duh.

Feel free to peruse Higgs Chains elsewhere in The Pool, or not.

Oh, but here’s the big surprise, quantum entanglement is actually spherical, not just run of the mill, linear, point to point stuff, which is all that the Chinese have pieced together so far. So when the 50lb heads get far along enough to see the spherical nature of entanglement, there will be Nobel Prizes all around. Funny how life works.

What does this mean? It means that the framework we use to describe stuff is hosed up like a soup sandwich. Einstein and Bohr quarreled over how “spooky” quantum entanglement is. That is because they were stuck in the axioms of Euclid’s Geometry, which has ZERO relevance to the way the Universe is actually built. Our whole framework is, well, wrong. The stuff you learned in school was, well, wrong.

Step up to Binary Dimension Theory, it will suddenly all make sense.

Enjoy The Pool. Kick your feet. Quantum entanglement keeps you afloat. Imagine that.


What’s infinity?

According to Websters;
“unlimited extent of time, space, or quantity, UNBOUNDED”

Gee, that must be a whole lot of whatever.

In mathematical terms, it is called a “limit”, meaning that adding more and more and more of something gets closer to Infinity without actually touching it. Convenient eh?

So to normal people, what does Infinity mean?  Not much, actually, because our brains are not made to comprehend it.

You are in luck. Binary Dimension Theory has a definition of Infinity that is easy to understand.

It says that dimension and infinity are the same, by definition.

Dimension, being fractal, looks the same viewed from any scale, in any amount or direction. Large or small, its all the same.

The Pool is deep here. Ready?

As it turns out, there is a natural “limit” that separates the very large from the very small, the Dimensioned, from the Undimensioned.

The limit is an equivalence, meaning that the limit of the very small and limit of the very large are the same limit. They converge to a particular construct.

The construct is called a Higgs Gate.

Higgs Gates separate Dimensioned from Undimensioned, the Infinitely Large from the Infinitely Small, from Zero.

So what?

Well, it means that there is an inexorable link between all the stuff around us and all the things like our thoughts and feelings, and God, that we can’t directly observe, but know exist.

It also means that there is a boundary that connects them (Higgs Gate), that allows thoughts, and feelings, and God to move into, and out of,  dimensioned space.

It also means that infinite constructs like God can, and do,  exist in dimensioned space.

That is the most profound sentence you have ever read, or will ever read.

Having a nice swim?